The Daily Click

::.

Author:	Fanotherpg	Submitted:	11 2006
Hits:	1724

It's my team home page. Page is very simple and plain because we don't like awesome graphics like on http://rst.phpnet.us (team which I'm member). Actually we work over 3 cRPGs (CT:FW, DS:FW, S2:SotSS) and MKWS. More information on page. Please comment.

Visit This Site: http://balon.ovh.org

Posted by Tim

May 11 2006

It's ok... it COULD do with some kinda nice template - but oh well. You might want to correct a few bits of English so it makes a little more sense in areas

Posted by axel

June 11 2006

Yeah, it looks a bit harsh

Posted by DaVince

June 11 2006

lol, all this extra effort thanks to tables. Use divs and CSS, it's much easier and can give the same result!

The colour scheme could use some finetuning, but the design isn't bad.

Posted by Fanotherpg

June 11 2006

English isn't my first language and I'm still learning it and it looks like we learn times etc. and not practical use.. So if you can help with this grammar mistakes.. And I don't like div and css because always when I write them they don't work under e.g. Mozilla.. and tables always work.. And now to add new page I must just change text...

Posted by DaVince

June 11 2006

"because always when I write them they don't work under e.g. Mozilla.."

Bullshit. I made a fully functional and good-looking site with divs and CSS only.
http://www.spheredev.org/~dnaproduct/

Besides, W3 states that tables are deprecated and you should use styles instead.

Posted by Fanotherpg

July 11 2006

Yea yea I know but always when I write Divs and CSS they only works under IE

Posted by axel

July 11 2006

Valid markup is the key.

http://validator.w3.org/
http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/

Posted by DaVince

July 11 2006

Oh yeah, and a verb after a plural noun is always plural, too. It works, but they work.

Posted by Tim

October 11 2006

I disagree with you saying that CSS and HTML is easier than writing straight into tables.

And it'll take at least 4+ years before tables depreciate and xhtml takes over

Posted by DaVince

November 11 2006

Of course! Defining table then table row then table cell then next table cell then next table row and two more table cells, then closing down the table is WAY easier than making two short pieces of CSS and 4 div's.