User of the Month is a really bad idea IMO. It could be too easily exploited, unless it's picked by the admins in which case people will whine and accuse them of being biased instead.
- Ok, you must admit that was the most creative cussing this site have ever seen -
Originally Posted by monkeytherat The way I see it, the only people whose feelings may get hurt are those who feel they should have won, they would probably be the nominees. You could deal with the not getting picked feelings hurt problem with a consolation prize,orpointing out that they were awesome enough to be nominated.
That consolation prize would eventually be as worthless as the VIP tag
Like the main prize would be worth anything to begin with.
/-=?=-/-=?=-/-=?=-/-=?=-/-=?=-/-=?=-/-=?=-/-=?=-/-=?=-/-=?=-/-=?=-/-=?=-/-=?=-/-=?=-/-=?=-/-=?=-/-=?=-/-=?=-/-=?=-/-=?=-/-=?=-/-=?=-/
That Really Hot Chick
now on the Xbox Live Marketplace!
Originally Posted by PhizzyPhan69 User of the Month is a really bad idea IMO. It could be too easily exploited, unless it's picked by the admins in which case people will whine and accuse them of being biased instead.
Originally Posted by PhizzyPhan69 User of the Month is a really bad idea IMO. It could be too easily exploited, unless it's picked by the admins in which case people will whine and accuse them of being biased instead.
I would win every month so not like it matters.
Yeah, with Gamester winning every month it would just get frustraiting for us all =(
I liked it when everybody got vapor ware ratings. When I was growing up and playing games with my brother. We had fun coming up with things for the losser to do. The vapor rating reminded of that.
I think that articles should need to be approved, like downloads. No offense to Dogzer, but his new article is a bunch of incorrect info that's only purpose was to get him points... I hat getting all excited about there finally being a new article only to find that it's poorly written or incorrect...
If you put a million monkeys at a million keyboards, one of them will eventually write a Java program.
The rest of them will write Perl programs.
A Troll Battle vote where people can vent their greivances (whether petty, meaningful or just fueled by either pre-puberty blues ,middle-aged rant(mine)or old timers regrets or even the jolly old green eyed disfulfilmantlessinarism and we can all pitch in here somewhat,
and vote in the
weekly winning witty worrisome And Naughty Klikers
(just dont abreviate it)
picture it
set xtroll1 to(number of votes)
set xtroll2 to(number of votes)
if xtroll1<0 then functioncall loselife1
if xtroll2>640 then functioncall loselife2
if day$="Monday" and xtroll1>320 then functioncall loselife2
if day$="Monday" and xtroll2<320 then functioncall loselife1
yep programming does indeed destroy the brain eventually
Would you mind making code work in signatures? I.e., make it so when you use html in a signature, it shows what the code does instead of showing the code.
If you put a million monkeys at a million keyboards, one of them will eventually write a Java program.
The rest of them will write Perl programs.
Advertisement
Post Reply
Edited by OMC