Well what I think is, It's bullshit when someone says that being gay is a chemical imbalance in the brain. First, I think that idea is stupid, and if it is a chemical imbalance, wouldn't that be considered, hmmm... I don't know? A MENTAL ILLNESS!? The duchebag that came up with that theory is problably the same retard who says that being obese is a virus.
Gays should have the same rights as straight people. They are no different and I can't believe people are still fighting this. There should be no opinions on gay marriages, just the truth that all people are equal and we should not oppress the gays.
Steve Zissou: Anne-Marie, do all the interns get Glocks?
I never knew you thought about me like that, Gilgamesh. Unfortunately I'm in love with Jason Orange from Take That, and it's only a matter of time before we become intimate.
JP: Does mental illness mean anything to you? I hate the fact that gays put themselves on levels of different races or things like that... Thus I shouldn't persecute them myself... Baahaah!
Pete Nattress Cheesy Bits img src/uploads/sccheesegif
Registered 23/09/2002
Points 4811
18th June, 2004 at 18:25:27 -
marriages: yes, adopting kids: no.
to clarify: homosexuality is not caused by a chemicle inbalance, nor is it classified as a psychological disorder. it's not new either, it's been around since the dawn of time
personally, i believe that gay marriage is fine. there is no reason to deny homosexuals the right to live as heterosexuals do. however i do have a problem with homosexual couples (gay or lesbian) adopting kids, simply because it's unfair on the kids. if you are homosexual, then having kids is something that is biologically not possible - so you should not try and "cheat" nature by adopting a child. as a psychology student as well, such an adoption is potentially damaging for the child, who (Freudians argue) requires a parent/role model of each gender to succesfully develop.
I don't think it's a chemical imbalance, and I don't think they choose to be gay. I didn't choose to be attracted to women. And the fact that homosexuality occurs in the wild among animals should be proof enough that is 100% normal and nothing to be ashamed about.
Steve Zissou: Anne-Marie, do all the interns get Glocks?
I wouldn't say its normal, in the wild there is no such thing as marriage and mating is just to produce more of the species...... its not possible in a homosexual relationship to do so, thus its not "normal" (In other words, it serves no point AT ALL).
I can respect the rights of gays to live as they please but to define marriage as a marriage between a man and a women OR a man and a man OR a women and a women is just not right.... frankly it is an insult.. mabey something LIKE marriage could be created with the same legal rights besides the right to adoption (as I think that is a crime aganst nature) but not the SAME as marriage!
That's just my view, call me narrow minded if you will but I belive I am right and that's all that matters in my mind.
vortex you have to structure your sentences better, that was hard to follow.
Sure it serves no purpose from a reproductive standpoint, no matter how hard you try buttsex wont make a baby, but it is completely normal for some men to like other men. Of course marriage does not exist in the wild, but homosexuality between to animals is not uncommon. male dogs humping each other, male birds trying to mount other male birds. One case of toads in Alaska, they thaw, and have a short amount of time to reproduce before the next frost comes. The result is that for about a month it's a wild orgy of toads, and in the confusion, males will have anal sex with other male toads. There are gay animals, and gay humans, gay is a fact, and gays have feelings. To treat gays as subhuman is disgusting.
Steve Zissou: Anne-Marie, do all the interns get Glocks?
Advertisement
Edited by the Author.
