How can you black. Black is not a verb. I can not go and black someone. Your example is stupid. I'll give you a different example, one that actually makes sense.
My sister lied to me once. I hate lies, they disgust me. Do i hate my sister? No. I love my sister. Hating a sin doesn't mean you hate the sinner.
_________________________________________
sententia, you are right. homosexuality is not a verb. But to be considered homosexual, you must put your penis into a man. In that sense, it implies some action on the individual's part to make them what they are. Unlike race.
You do not need to put your genital in any specific place at all to be considered homosexual, that is just a stupid thing to say. And if that was the case, would lesbians be considered straight? (homosexuality isn't gender-specific you know )
I think it's quite demeaning that you only consider the sexual aspect of homosexuality. You know, a gay person can live in a platonic relationship with someone and still be gay. You're just very off on very many areas.
And as it has come down to the core question this particular argument can't continue, the question being why a person is homosexual. You, in direct contradiction to like 99% of all gay people, consider being homosexual a choice. I believe it is not. In the same way as you do not choose race, I believe you do not choose sexual preference, validating my example.
The only people who can do something similar to choosing is bisexual people.
Most gay people have tried to supress their nature but not been able to. How would you explain that?
And since we will never agree on the reason why a person is homosexual, we can just stop the argument now.
I knew that was your point from the very beginning, I just wanted to clearify that I hadn't accused anyone here of verbalizing that hate, and that I think hating in itself is something disruptive and destructive.
Originally Posted by AndyUK Yeah you don't breath in the womb, thats what the umbilical cord is for. Don't forget not developing properly happens all the time in nature...
Maybe you should find out what natural means?
Also stop saying people choose to be gay, thats just not true.
wow. could you make a statement on any less evidence than you just did? as a baby your lungs are filled with liquid (amniotic fluid). babies breath liquid oxygen. the embilical chord is connected to the stomach and is a source for which it recieves nutrients. even if somehow a baby DID survive in the womb without lungs it would die almost immediately at birth.
do you even know what youre talking about?
as for being gay by choice, a percentage of the gay community agree that it is a concious choice. its easy to blame something about yourself on genetics. "oh i was born gay so theres nothing i can do about it". they dont HAVE to have sex with their same sex. they dont HAVE to act on their psychological urges. and they blame their genetics, when the truth is, conciously or subconciously they dont WANT to do anything about their situation, cause then theyd be held responsible.
dont tell me to stop saying something without providing a decent and supported argument when all i have done is do so.
oh i forgot to insert some information. yes the baby does get oxygen from the umbilical chord. but in the later terms it does breathe with its lungs. so yes it WOULD die in the womb from complications without lungs.
sorry if i came on a little harsh. im suffering from an asshole manager and its late. sorry andy.
A gay gene wouldn't make any sense. Genes can't be passed on unless you have kids, and gay sex doesn't make kids. Your sexual urge probably is determined by your environment.
exactly. which is why i hate it when people say they are born gay. complete bull. and even if you were it would HAVE to be a genetic mutation which WOULD make it unnatural.
its environmental and psychological. it should be treated as a psychological problem.
I have a comment on my own, but that won't be fair since I locked this thread. Best this thread stay locked before Phizzy detects it and does bad things to you guys.
Administrative Message: This topic has been locked.
Edited by an Administrator.
Disclaimer: Any sarcasm in my posts will not be mentioned as that would ruin the purpose. It is assumed that the reader is intelligent enough to tell the difference between what is sarcasm and what is not.
Advertisement
And if that was the case, would lesbians be considered straight? 
(homosexuality isn't gender-specific you know 
)
Edited by the Author.
