The Daily Click ::. Forums ::. Daily Click ::. What do you think happened to this place?
 

Post Reply  Post Oekaki 
 

Posted By Message

WillWill

Give me stuff

Registered
  24/07/2006
Points
  552
14th May, 2010 at 04:52:20 -

I'm guessing this has been discussed A LOT already, but my conclusion is that a lot of the people who surfed this place during the 'golden age' have started to grow up.

The market is flooding with game-making software, and the competition is getting bigger and bigger, which simply prevents new users from finding this place after googling "game-making". What's left is a bunch of loyal members who eventually gets jobs, families and everything else that is so much more rewarding for a lot of people.

 
http://www.morphboy.newgrounds.com/
^ Free tunes, as long as you contact me.

nim



Registered
  17/05/2002
Points
  7234
14th May, 2010 at 06:14:34 -

I think that sums it up.

 
//

Mr_Tom



Registered
  01/12/2007
Points
  389
14th May, 2010 at 11:05:15 -

well this site could be revived to its former glory, maybe what i'm about to say is blasphemy or something but.. .why does this have to be a clickteam product exclusive game making site? what is the reason for that? Why not refocus its target audience to 'indie game development in general' people who want to make games through whatever means they choose. MMf2; Game-Maker.. CONSTRUCT or more advanced scripted games etc.. maybe even include sections for game mods or mapping. I mean I first visited TDC back in 2003 or something and tbh its pretty much IDENTICAl!

 
n/a

alastair john jack

BANNED

Registered
  01/10/2004
Points
  294

GOTW WINNER CUP 1!GOTW WINNER CUP 2!GOTW WINNER CUP 3!VIP MemberMushroomI am an April Fool
14th May, 2010 at 11:56:43 -


why does this have to be a clickteam product exclusive game making site?




It's not. lol.

 
lol

nim



Registered
  17/05/2002
Points
  7234
14th May, 2010 at 13:27:10 -

I remember when the klik community was as big as it is now, and we had one message board (The Wall) and The AP-Zone. Now we have this huge site, which is nice to have, but it's like 20 people walking around Costco.

 
//

Hayo

Stone Goose

Registered
  15/08/2002
Points
  6949

Game of the Week WinnerHas Donated, Thank You!VIP MemberGOTM 3RD PLACE! - APRIL 2009Weekly Picture Me This Round 27 Winner!Weekly Picture Me This Round 41 Winner!Weekly Picture Me This Round 45 Winner!
14th May, 2010 at 13:54:08 -

I think mr Tom has a point. Even though this is not a click-only site 90% of the people think it is (might be the name). But I think Rikus and gang are already working on that.

 
www.hayovanreek.nl

Mr_Tom



Registered
  01/12/2007
Points
  389
14th May, 2010 at 17:13:18 -

Its not a clickteam product exclusive site??.... yeah it is.
Its not like it is enforced but i mean look at the forum there is a board for 'Other software bsides click' while the rest are click dedicated. Doesnt exactly give a welcome message to visitors who use different software. they WILL go elsewhere.

 
n/a

Matt Boothman

The Nissan Micra of forum members

Registered
  20/09/2002
Points
  109

Game of the Week Winner
14th May, 2010 at 22:44:13 -

I don't think it should be for any other products than Click. If I wanted an indie game forum, I'd go somewhere else for that. What's wrong with having a bit of a niche?

 
http://soundcloud.com/normbo - Listen to my music.

AndyUK

Mascot Maniac

Registered
  01/08/2002
Points
  14586

Game of the Week WinnerSecond GOTW AwardHas Donated, Thank You!VIP Member
15th May, 2010 at 00:55:57 -

I foresee a lot of fighting between the users of various game makers.

 
.

Mr_Tom



Registered
  01/12/2007
Points
  389
15th May, 2010 at 01:29:11 -

"If I wanted an indie game forum, I'd go somewhere else for that. What's wrong with having a bit of a niche? "

that is exactly my point. people who want an indie game forum go somewhere else for that. How about we make it so they don't. What is wrong with having a bit of a niche? well its a niche! and by definition small in audience. TDC requires funding you know.

 
n/a

Matt Boothman

The Nissan Micra of forum members

Registered
  20/09/2002
Points
  109

Game of the Week Winner
15th May, 2010 at 03:18:52 -

That argument doesn't make sense. It requires funding up to the level of its userbase; if TDC suddenly got thousands of new visitors, bandwidth costs would rocket upwards.

How about TDC scales down its website? Just a thought - make it exclusively Clickteam, get rid of the Arcade, the useless points system, and KlikCast, make the content more specific (vetting for games that get allowed in the d/l section, so no demos or crap, but allow a section of the forum for specific games to be posted and be discussed); in short, make the site smaller but better.

Not an entirely serious or specific plan, but just pointing out that maybe we're looking at it the wrong way. Instead of making TDC this big, sprawling, directionless website, we could actually pinpoint what the site should actually be all about: Click.

 
http://soundcloud.com/normbo - Listen to my music.

alastair john jack

BANNED

Registered
  01/10/2004
Points
  294

GOTW WINNER CUP 1!GOTW WINNER CUP 2!GOTW WINNER CUP 3!VIP MemberMushroomI am an April Fool
15th May, 2010 at 05:20:02 -

I like that idea, I think.

 
lol

Marko

I like you You like you

Registered
  08/05/2008
Points
  2804

Has Donated, Thank You!Game of the Week WinnerVIP Member360 OwnerDos Rules!Happy FellahCrazy EvilI am an April FoolGingerbread House
15th May, 2010 at 07:39:25 -


Originally Posted by Matt Boothman
That argument doesn't make sense. It requires funding up to the level of its userbase; if TDC suddenly got thousands of new visitors, bandwidth costs would rocket upwards.

How about TDC scales down its website? Just a thought - make it exclusively Clickteam, get rid of the Arcade, the useless points system, and KlikCast, make the content more specific (vetting for games that get allowed in the d/l section, so no demos or crap, but allow a section of the forum for specific games to be posted and be discussed); in short, make the site smaller but better.

Not an entirely serious or specific plan, but just pointing out that maybe we're looking at it the wrong way. Instead of making TDC this big, sprawling, directionless website, we could actually pinpoint what the site should actually be all about: Click.


Now THAT is a radical (and actually not that crazy) thought!!

As for the "no demos or crap" comment - how about a demos section set away from the actual Downloads section entirely? We could even put game engines in there too.

 
Image

Subliminal Dreams. . ., daily gaming news and the home of Mooneyman Studios!
www.mooneyman-studios.webs.com

Hayo

Stone Goose

Registered
  15/08/2002
Points
  6949

Game of the Week WinnerHas Donated, Thank You!VIP MemberGOTM 3RD PLACE! - APRIL 2009Weekly Picture Me This Round 27 Winner!Weekly Picture Me This Round 41 Winner!Weekly Picture Me This Round 45 Winner!
15th May, 2010 at 11:16:37 -


Originally Posted by Matt Boothman
That argument doesn't make sense. It requires funding up to the level of its userbase; if TDC suddenly got thousands of new visitors, bandwidth costs would rocket upwards.

How about TDC scales down its website? Just a thought - make it exclusively Clickteam, get rid of the Arcade, the useless points system, and KlikCast, make the content more specific (vetting for games that get allowed in the d/l section, so no demos or crap, but allow a section of the forum for specific games to be posted and be discussed); in short, make the site smaller but better.

Not an entirely serious or specific plan, but just pointing out that maybe we're looking at it the wrong way. Instead of making TDC this big, sprawling, directionless website, we could actually pinpoint what the site should actually be all about: Click.



Yes. Yes yes yes.

 
www.hayovanreek.nl

Mr_Tom



Registered
  01/12/2007
Points
  389
15th May, 2010 at 15:43:50 -

"It requires funding up to the level of its userbase; if TDC suddenly got thousands of new visitors, bandwidth costs would rocket upwards."
-there is such a thing as economy of scale. Yeah higher costs but also higher revenue, chances are revenue increase will exceed cost increase if you increase your audience. The more you add to the userbase the less the cost per user is. I mean imagine if the site had 1 visitor, it would cost a fair amount more per user than if it had 10000 visitors.


I dont want to make this an argument but i'd like to understand this idea. genuinely could someone explain to me why they would want this site to be MORE clickteam orientated and scaled back to a smaller userbase? Don't you want to encourage more people to make and share games, or hide away so that noone else can see your games or be introduced to making them? It just doesnt seem to make sense to me.


 
n/a
   

Post Reply



 



Advertisement

Worth A Click