The Daily Click ::. Forums ::. Misc Chat ::. mac crap
 


 

Posted By Message

JP



Registered
  07/06/2003
Points
  1338
17th October, 2004 at 04:02:02 -

Well it looks like we wont be seeing Edwin anymore. I despise macs, I have to use them every day at the media class, the only thing good about them is the looks. Video editing is NOT any faster on the macs. Why the fuck would you spend $2199 on a 1.8ghz processor? You cant honestly tell me that your going to spend the same amount on a computer with 1.8 ghz less than a PC? Not to mention that you get a thousand less options in software and hardware. It just defies all common sense, but I don't care, because the price you pay for buying a mac is owning one.

 
Steve Zissou: Anne-Marie, do all the interns get Glocks?

Anne-Marie: No, they have to share one.

Rick (AntiMatter Entertainment)

Possible psychotic

Registered
  18/10/2002
Points
  814

VIP Member360 OwnerWii Owner
17th October, 2004 at 04:35:36 -

Amen. Or something.

 

David Newton (DavidN)

Invisible

Registered
  27/10/2002
Points
  8322

Honored Admin Alumnus
17th October, 2004 at 07:26:12 -

Told you so, Pete!

Despite my girlfriend trying to teach me how to use hers, I can't get used to Macs at all. The biggest problem I have is that Ctrl-C is not "copy" but instead "delete everything I've selected and make it unrecoverable" - which is something that I discovered to my cost!

 
http://www.davidn.co.nr - Games, music, living in America

AndyUK

Mascot Maniac

Registered
  01/08/2002
Points
  14586

Game of the Week WinnerSecond GOTW AwardHas Donated, Thank You!VIP Member
17th October, 2004 at 09:02:37 -

you get more for your money with a pc, my 3gig cost me 800 quid whereas the same sort of thing on a mac would cost about 5000 shiny coins

 
.

David Newton (DavidN)

Invisible

Registered
  27/10/2002
Points
  8322

Honored Admin Alumnus
17th October, 2004 at 09:21:49 -

Apparently the Mac uses its processor more efficiently, though, so just the clock speed of the processor alone isn't really a good comparison. At least, so I've been told.

 
http://www.davidn.co.nr - Games, music, living in America

Radix

hot for teacher

Registered
  01/10/2003
Points
  3139

Has Donated, Thank You!VIP MemberGOTW WINNER CUP 1!GOTW WINNER CUP 2!GOTW WINNER CUP 3!GOTW WINNER CUP 4!
17th October, 2004 at 09:47:25 -

Right, mac architecture is quite different, and mac CPUs have pretty huge FSBs AFAIK. Nowhere near big enough to be worth an extra 4200 shiny coins though.

 
n/a

Batchman



Registered
  08/08/2003
Points
  231
17th October, 2004 at 10:37:57 -

anything that can run bochs can run MMF ...

MMF for PocketPC ! lol

 
n/a

ChrisB

Crazy?

Registered
  16/08/2002
Points
  5457
17th October, 2004 at 11:34:47 -

Mac processors also have many more transistors than Intel chips, so things like floating point calculation is several times faster. Just look at the performance of SETI on Mac and PC with the same speed processor.

 
n/a

AsparagusTrevor

Mine's a pint of the black stuff

Registered
  20/08/2002
Points
  2364

Game of the Week WinnerHas Donated, Thank You!VIP MemberEvil kliker
17th October, 2004 at 12:50:33 -

I once saw a TV show where they actually compared equivelent powered Macs and PCs in different ways, and the whole 'Macs are better for video editing and Photoshop' was proved to be bollocks, in fact the Mac took 30 seconds to apply a Photoshop filter that the PC took 5 seconds to do. The only field the Mac won in was setup time.

I used to use Macs at college and grew to hate them with a massive passion. Sure they look nice, but that's all they're good at. What's the point in owning a computer what a large percentage of software doesn't run on, just for looks?

 
Image

David Newton (DavidN)

Invisible

Registered
  27/10/2002
Points
  8322

Honored Admin Alumnus
17th October, 2004 at 12:56:03 -

They replaced all the Linux machines in our computer science lab with Macs. They look like lamps. And someone on the first day - presumably an ex-subhonours student - had scrawled on the board "Ha ha! You have to use Macs!"

Image Edited by the Author.

 
http://www.davidn.co.nr - Games, music, living in America

AsparagusTrevor

Mine's a pint of the black stuff

Registered
  20/08/2002
Points
  2364

Game of the Week WinnerHas Donated, Thank You!VIP MemberEvil kliker
17th October, 2004 at 13:28:09 -

Making kids use Macs at school and college is akin to child abuse.

 
Image

Radix

hot for teacher

Registered
  01/10/2003
Points
  3139

Has Donated, Thank You!VIP MemberGOTW WINNER CUP 1!GOTW WINNER CUP 2!GOTW WINNER CUP 3!GOTW WINNER CUP 4!
17th October, 2004 at 13:39:27 -

Not nearly as much fun though.

 
n/a

Pete Nattress

Cheesy Bits img src/uploads/sccheesegif

Registered
  23/09/2002
Points
  4811
17th October, 2004 at 14:01:36 -

"Not to mention the fact that Window's is so much easyer to get around. (Might just be because Windows was the first system I actually attapted too though.)"

actually, macs were the first PCs to use a GUI like the ones we're used to today. they nicked some of their ideas for it from Xerox.

 
www.thenatflap.co.uk

Jamesbuc



Registered
  24/05/2003
Points
  502
17th October, 2004 at 14:16:06 -

No pete sometimes Macs are quite easy the get aroun.

 
I met a budgie called percy. He likes chicken...

How random

JP



Registered
  07/06/2003
Points
  1338
17th October, 2004 at 14:17:57 -

It's retarded that schools buy macs, why would you want to teach kids on a computer that has less than 3% of the market share? You need windows skills for the workplace, no one uses macs.

 
Steve Zissou: Anne-Marie, do all the interns get Glocks?

Anne-Marie: No, they have to share one.
This thread has been locked by an administrator



 



Advertisement

Worth A Click